Information Chiudi Hello! We have detected English as your language preference. To change your preferred language, please choose a language using the dropdown.
Information Chiudi We will be performing database maintenance on the Collection database on 6/12/2025 from 1:00pm PDT to 5:00pm PDT. Collection pages may be slow to load and additions / removals may be delayed
Mass edit with no discussion and negative votes... another abuse?
Iniziata da capocamillo over 9 years ago, 26 risposte
-
Mostra questo messaggio
I take 3 negative votes from the same withour any discussion in the matter. He merged all the printers related to the labels Cgd and Cbs without any discussion invalidating some credits at his pleasure
https://www.discogs.sie.com/it/release/6127373-La-Spagnola-Tango-Delle-Capinere/history#latest
I edited them as they appears on the release and wothout any discossion on the matter I think I did the right thing.
I asked to link the discussion if it exist and this is his replay
https://www.discogs.sie.com/it/messages/view/0H7G68PHmnSsJmGZHGHlfw -
Mostra questo messaggio
3 Negative votes?
Please link the votes, thanx
You continue to create new company, we have work years ago to cleaned and merge same company, and you create new ones, see the new one here
https://www.discogs.sie.com/submissions?mode=saved#mode=saved&item=%2Frelease%2F8304277-Il-Classico-Perez-Prado%2Fhistory -
Mostra questo messaggio
Are you joking? you give me 3 negative votes on these
https://www.discogs.sie.com/it/release/6127373-La-Spagnola-Tango-Delle-Capinere/history#latest
and then you have edited by yourself so the votes are not visibles now -
Mostra questo messaggio
No, if i have vote you have the messages, and is correct vote, see Head page company
Why you have correct the last one?
Abuse? -
Mostra questo messaggio
ladrodipolli
if i have vote you have the messages,
in fact I have the messages...
Discogs Discogs Needs Minor Changes vote was cast on Pierre ... 1 day ago
Discogs Discogs Needs Minor Changes vote was cast on Gianni ... 1 day ago
Discogs Discogs Needs Minor Changes vote was cast on Gigliola ... 1 day ago
copied from my inoming emails -
Mostra questo messaggio
I don't know if above are true, you have the link if i have vote
Also, the vote was correct. -
Mostra questo messaggio
You vote is no more visible because you edit them but I got your uncorect vote, without any discussion on the matter. -
Mostra questo messaggio
No, again, i'm sure you have the link of messages, i have correct, not covered vote, i think you want only make confusion, so, why you have created new company and after my comment changed here
https://www.discogs.sie.com/submissions?mode=saved#mode=saved&item=%2Frelease%2F8304277-Il-Classico-Perez-Prado%2Fhistory Abuse? or right comment? -
Mostra questo messaggio
ladrodipolli
you have the link if i have vote
He can't post a link to messages in his inbox. You've been here long enough to know that.
https://www.discogs.sie.com/ -
Mostra questo messaggio
inexpressible
If you think this is a case of voting
Is voting abuse?
See HEAD company page, not created by me
https://www.discogs.sie.com/label/358526-Reparto-Tipografico-CBS-Sugar -
Mostra questo messaggio
ladrodipolli
Is voting abuse?
I don't know (and don't care TBH), that's up for Discogs staff to decide. -
Mostra questo messaggio
ladrodipolli
why you have created new company and after my comment changed here
https://www.discogs.sie.com/submissions?mode=saved#mode=saved&item=%2Frelease%2F8304277-Il-Classico-Perez-Prado%2Fhistory
I made a mistake here so I corrected it as it should be. -
ladrodipolli modificato over 9 years ago
capocamillo
I made a mistake here so I corrected it as it should be.
Because the others is no mistakes? -
Mostra questo messaggio
I have no idea what's going here, but it needs to stop before it gets out of hand. -
Mostra questo messaggio
The discussion should be whether "Reparto Tipolitografico CBS-Sugar" can simply be stated to be equivalent to Reparto Tipografico CBS Sugar - looks rather like two companies -
Mostra questo messaggio
washizu
The discussion should be whether "Reparto Tipolitografico CBS-Sugar" can simply be stated to be equivalent to Reparto Tipografico CBS Sugar - looks rather like two companies
If they are 2 companies my edits was good. and anyway he can be give negative votes without discussion. I was searching for a discussion on the matter before opening a thread, but I didn't find it. -
Mostra questo messaggio
Is the same thing
http://dizionari.repubblica.it/Italiano/T/tipolitografia.php
tipolitografia
[ti-po-li-to-gra-fì-a]
s.f. (pl. -fìe)
Laboratorio attrezzato per la stampa sia tipografica sia litografica
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
equipped laboratory for letterpress and lithographic -
Mostra questo messaggio
capocamillo
f they are 2 companies my edits was good.
Your edits was good?
Yes, why here you want separate same company ?
https://www.discogs.sie.com/label/358526-Reparto-Tipografico-CBS-Sugar
and here you want merge Ariston to Ariston Records ?
https://www.discogs.sie.com/forum/thread/704459
I think you want only made confusion -
Mostra questo messaggio
the meaning is the same, but 2 different company names = 2 different entities until a proof that concerning the same entity is given. -
Mostra questo messaggio
capocamillo
the meaning is the same, but 2 different company names
Really ? you have insist for days and days that you are right........ -
Mostra questo messaggio
capocamillo
the meaning is the same, but 2 different company names = 2 different entities until a proof that concerning the same entity is given.
Yes I want to merge them and I opened a thread trying to giving proof or sources, but everybody says also you that
capocamillo
.
2 different company names = 2 different entities until a proof t
Did you open a thread on the matter before leaving negative votes? -
Mostra questo messaggio
Again?
Is the same!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is the same thing
http://dizionari.repubblica.it/Italiano/T/tipolitografia.php
tipolitografia
[ti-po-li-to-gra-fì-a]
s.f. (pl. -fìe)
Laboratorio attrezzato per la stampa sia tipografica sia litografica
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
equipped laboratory for letterpress and lithographic -
ladrodipolli modificato over 9 years ago
We have works 3-4 years ago with other s here to cleaned dozens of mistakes, printed company put under artwork, dozens of same company writtent by s in a different way, but the same.
for CBS Sugar and CGD the result as two different company:
https://www.discogs.sie.com/label/425509-Stampa-Reparto-Grafico-CGD
Without S.p.a., or S.r.l. , S.a.s. the entity don't changed from this two company.
Mass edit don't exist, in the years we have put under this two company, is no possible justified every month the same thing -
Mostra questo messaggio
When I edited my sub there was already a page "Reparto Tipolitografico Cbs-Sugar" with other releases on it so I put mine in that page following what is written on the release itself, now you have changed all htese releases without any discussion... its called mass edit
https://www.discogs.sie.com/it//ladrodipolli/submissions#item=%2Fit%2Frelease%2F3168200-Papaya%2Fhistory
...and so on
and you also put as invalid the entire page without any discussion
https://www.discogs.sie.com/it//ladrodipolli/submissions#item=%2Fit%2Flabel%2F882724-Reparto-Tipolitografico-Cbs-Sugar%2Fhistory -
Mostra questo messaggio
You don't have arguments, sorry -
Mostra questo messaggio
ladrodipolli
We have works 3-4 years ago with other s here to cleaned dozens of mistakes, printed company put under artwork, dozens of same company writtent by s in a different way
where did you take this decisions with other s at your home?
Please link the discussion if exist. -
Mostra questo messaggio
Oh my God! I'm really bored. I another , the way you do is the same, that he had here many s, was near Taranto, the same way you do, insist on Ariston, it has tried to change other label, you look the same!
Accedi Devi effettuare l'accesso per poter scrivere.